000 04239nam a22005535i 4500
001 978-3-031-44159-2
003 DE-He213
005 20240423130133.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 231016s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031441592
_9978-3-031-44159-2
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-44159-2
_2doi
050 4 _aQ334-342
050 4 _aTA347.A78
072 7 _aUYQ
_2bicssc
072 7 _aCOM004000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aUYQ
_2thema
082 0 4 _a006.3
_223
100 1 _aClocksin, William F.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 1 0 _aComputational Modelling of Robot Personhood and Relationality
_h[electronic resource] /
_cby William F. Clocksin.
250 _a1st ed. 2024.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer Nature Switzerland :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2024.
300 _aXI, 101 p. 12 illus.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aSpringerBriefs in Computer Science,
_x2191-5776
505 0 _aPart 1: Androids: Persons and Relationships -- Introduction -- Significant Concerns -- Personhood and Relationality -- Part 2: The Affinity System -- The Computational Model -- Modelling Concerns -- The Economy -- Narratives -- Analysis of Value Systems -- Conclusion.
520 _aThis SpringerBrief is a computational study of significant concerns and their role in forming long-term relationships between intelligent entities. Significant concerns include attitudes, preferences, affinities, and values that are held to be highly valued and meaningful: The means through which a person may find deeply held identity, purpose, and transformation. Significant concerns always engage the emotions and senses in a way that simply holding an opinion may or may not. For example, experiencing a significant concern may provoke deep feelings of awe and wonder in a way that deciding what to have for lunch probably does not, even if the lunch decision involves a rich array of preferences and values. Significant concerns also include what Emmons has called ultimate concerns. The author builds upon this base by considering the hypothetical case of intelligence in androids. An android is defined as a human-like robot that humans would accept as equal to humans in how theyperform and behave in society. An android as defined in this book is not considered to be imitating a human, nor is its purpose to deceive humans into believing that it is a human. Instead, the appropriately programmed android self-identifies as a non-human with its own integrity as a person. Therefore, a computational understanding of personhood and how persons – whether human or android – participate in relationships is essential to this perspective on artificial intelligence. Computational Modelling of Robot Personhood and Relationality describes in technical detail an implementation of a computational model called Affinity that takes the form of a simulation of a population of entities that form, maintain, and break relationships with each other depending upon a rich range of values, motivations, attitudes, and beliefs. Future experimentation and improvements of this model may be used not only to gain a wider understanding of human persons but may also form a preliminary cognitive model of the reasoning process of an android.
650 0 _aArtificial intelligence.
650 0 _aUser interfaces (Computer systems).
650 0 _aHuman-computer interaction.
650 0 _aSocial psychology.
650 1 4 _aArtificial Intelligence.
650 2 4 _aUser Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction.
650 2 4 _aSocial Psychology.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031441585
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031441608
830 0 _aSpringerBriefs in Computer Science,
_x2191-5776
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44159-2
912 _aZDB-2-SCS
912 _aZDB-2-SXCS
942 _cSPRINGER
999 _c185442
_d185442