000 04019nam a22005535i 4500
001 978-3-540-45332-1
003 DE-He213
005 20240423132506.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s2001 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783540453321
_9978-3-540-45332-1
024 7 _a10.1007/3-540-45332-6
_2doi
050 4 _aQA76.76.C65
072 7 _aUMC
_2bicssc
072 7 _aCOM010000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aUMC
_2thema
082 0 4 _a005.45
_223
245 1 0 _aTypes in Compilation
_h[electronic resource] :
_bThird International Workshop, TIC 2000, Montreal, Canada, September 21, 2000. Revised Selected Papers /
_cedited by Robert Harper.
250 _a1st ed. 2001.
264 1 _aBerlin, Heidelberg :
_bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2001.
300 _aX, 214 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aLecture Notes in Computer Science,
_x1611-3349 ;
_v2071
505 0 _aTypes in Compilation -- Sound and Complete Elimination of Singleton Kinds -- Program Representation Size in an Intermediate Language with Intersection and Union Types -- An Abstract Model of Java Dynamic Linking and Loading -- Sharing in Typed Module Assembly Language -- Scalable Certification for Typed Assembly Language -- Safe and Flexible Dynamic Linking of Native Code -- Alias Types for Recursive Data Structures.
520 _aThe importance of typed languages for building robust software systems is, by now, an undisputed fact. Years of research have led to languages with richly expressive, yet easy to use, type systems for high-level programming languages. Types provide not only a conceptual framework for language designers, but also a ord positive bene ts to the programmer, principally the ability to express and enforce levels of abstraction within a program. Early compilers for typed languages followed closely the methods used for their untyped counterparts. The role of types was limited to the earliest s- ges of compilation, and they were thereafter ignored during the remainder of the translation process. More recently, however, implementors have come to - cognize the importance of types during compilation and even for object code. Several advantages of types in compilation have been noted to date: { They support self-checking by the compiler. By tracking types during c- pilation it is possible for an internal type checker to detect translation errors at an early stage, greatly facilitating compiler development. { They support certi cation of object code. By extending types to the ge- rated object code, it becomes possible for a code user to ensure the basic integrity of that code by checking its type consistency before execution. { They support optimized data representations and calling conventions, even in the presence of modularity. By passing types at compile-, link-, and even run-time, it is possible to avoid compromises of data representation imposed by untyped compilation techniques.
650 0 _aCompilers (Computer programs).
650 0 _aComputer science.
650 0 _aMachine theory.
650 1 4 _aCompilers and Interpreters.
650 2 4 _aComputer Science Logic and Foundations of Programming.
650 2 4 _aFormal Languages and Automata Theory.
700 1 _aHarper, Robert.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783540421962
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783662175125
830 0 _aLecture Notes in Computer Science,
_x1611-3349 ;
_v2071
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45332-6
912 _aZDB-2-SCS
912 _aZDB-2-SXCS
912 _aZDB-2-LNC
912 _aZDB-2-BAE
942 _cSPRINGER
999 _c188344
_d188344